.comment-link {margin-left:.6em;}

Spookhead

Åsikter och mer eller mindre löst tyckande om allt som är aktuellt och intressant i den svenska samhällsdebatten, dock med reservation för diverse utflykter även till andra ämnen och länder.

 

torsdag, november 17, 2005

Rummel om realism och idealism

Professor Rummel skriver på sin blogg Democratic Peace om "Realistic Idealism vs. Idealistic Realism". Mycket tänkvärt:
"Today, the major intellectual conflict is not between libertarians and Bushites, or what I will now call freedomists, on democracy and peace. The libertarians simply don’t count. Both realists and freedomists see them as irrelevant, a cult of isolationists. Nor are the leftists in the ring. They are seen as, you know... leftists. They will side with anyone they see as anti-American. The realists see the freedomist’s emphasis on democracy as unrealistic and dangerous, as creating an unstable world in which more war may be the outcome, and our national interests endangered. The freedomist see the realist as adhering to dogma that no longer applies to the new post-Cold War world, and that fostering freedom is the bestway to protect the nation in the long run, and promote a peaceful world."
Klockrent tycker jag! (mina fetningar i texten ovan)

Hela inlägget finns här.

Comments: Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home